Las Vegas: VICE ENFORCEMENT’S TOP OFFENDERS

Police are taking unprecedented steps to keep prostitution offenders off the Strip
Feb. 15, 2009
Copyright © Las Vegas Review-Journal

WORKING GIRLS: Las Vegas’ 50 most prolific prostitutes

By ALAN MAIMON
LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL
Call it a unique kind of most wanted list or simply an attempt to clamp down on the area’s worst-kept secret.

Working off a roster of the reputed 50 “most prolific prostitutes” in Clark County, Las Vegas police and prosecutors are taking unprecedented steps to keep repeat prostitution offenders off the Strip.

Some are criticizing the law enforcement crackdown as overly aggressive. And it comes at a time when some policymakers are talking about eventually legalizing or decriminalizing prostitution in the Las Vegas Valley.

The Vice Enforcement Top Offenders (VETO) list, which took the vice unit two years to compile, has the names of women with the longest prostitution-related criminal records in Clark County, said Lt. Karen Hughes.

Most of the women on the list have been convicted of exchanging sex for money or of prostitution-related theft charges inside several Strip hotels, not for street prostitution.

Within days of launching the crackdown, police over Super Bowl weekend arrested 13 of the women on charges of soliciting prostitution, loitering for the purposes of prostitution, or trespassing, police records show.

In all, 24 of the 50 women on the list were arrested between Jan. 28 and Feb. 13, all on misdemeanor charges.

Six on the list were arrested twice during that period.

Those arrested range in age from 20 to 41.

Police declined a request by the Review-Journal for the entire VETO list.

Hughes said it is time to stop the revolving door of prostitution-related arrests, especially when those arrests involve “trick rolls,” in which prostitutes steal from men.

“We’re talking about girls who have been arrested repeatedly over the years, ones that we all know by face and by name,” said Hughes, citing one woman who was arrested 18 times in a single year.

“If they get the message that Las Vegas is not going to ignore their subsequent arrests, then maybe they’ll take their lifestyle to a different city,” she said.

Or at least to a different part of Clark County.

In a memo to prosecutors about VETO cases, Assistant District Attorney Christopher Lalli last month told his staff to offer plea agreements that would include possible jail time and an order that defendants “refrain from entering the resort corridor” for a period of six or 12 months.

The guilty plea offer also will include 100 hours of community service and mandatory attendance of an AIDS awareness class.

If caught back in the resort corridor for any reason other than lawful employment or residency, the subject will be rearrested and given jail time, Lalli’s memo said.

City and county ordinances have allowed for so-called “order-out zones” in downtown Las Vegas and the Strip since the late 1990s.

In the past, order-outs usually were agreed to by defendants in exchange for probation.

Hughes spoke about the VETO program and the general problem of prostitution at a meeting of Justice Court judges last month.

The judges were briefed on the initiative even before the sheriff was.

Her appearance before the justices of the peace is problematic, said Gary Peck, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Nevada. “It’s a cause for real concern when police are going to judges and promoting their policy for cleaning up the Strip.”

Peck also wondered whether police are relying so heavily on a Top 50 list that it will lead to prostitution arrests without probable cause. Such arrests would pave the way for the issuance of order-outs.

“It would be troubling if this list is being used as a substitute for sound police judgment,” he said.

Hughes said police won’t make initial prostitution-related arrests without proof that a new crime has been committed.

“Just because they’re on the list doesn’t mean they’re going to jail,” she said.

Lalli said he hopes the VETO effort will put a dent in prostitution. He cited special prosecution guidelines on other crimes such as car theft, which has been dwindling recently, as evidence that crackdowns work.

“Prostitution is one of those areas that brings with it a whole host of undesirable things,” Lalli said. “If you’re a prostitute out there, the message is, ‘Don’t commit your act of prostitution around here.’ ”

Hughes said new names probably would be added to the VETO list once the first set of cases goes through the court system.

She said law enforcement’s tough approach to the problem could give way to a push for other alternative sentences for prostitutes and even a court that hears only prostitution cases.

Mayor Oscar Goodman, whose jurisdiction doesn’t include the Strip, questioned whether a crackdown on prostitutes is the best public policy. He said pimps should be the main targets of law enforcement.

“It’s the exploiters of these women who are the real villains here,” Goodman said. “I have a deep and abiding conviction that they are the primary offenders.”

Just because police don’t have a list of the most prolific pimps doesn’t mean the vice unit is ignoring that part of the problem in its undercover operations, Hughes said.

“We’ve got two investigative teams that deal with nothing but pimps,” she said. “But we also want to minimize opportunities for prostitutes to be aggressive with the tourists and with men who aren’t interested in that.”

Citing more than 5,000 prostitution arrests last year by the vice unit along the Strip, a 46 percent increase from the number two years ago, Hughes said she is concerned that prostitution hurts tourism and creates a bad image for Las Vegas.

“Vice has always had a zero tolerance on prostitution,” Hughes said. “There’s more work out there than we can wrap our arms around. Our hope is that we convey to prostitutes and pimps who operate here that this is not an easy city to make money.”

She rallied support for the VETO effort at a meeting of hotel security chiefs earlier this month.

Several hotel officials contacted by the Review-Journal didn’t return phone calls.

Hotels are just one place police are looking for prostitutes, Hughes said. Their attention is also directed on the street and at “erotic services” advertised in print and online publications.

In a related effort, undercover female officers make arrests of men who try to hire prostitutes. This group tends to be less apt to reoffend, according to Hughes.

As police ratchet up efforts to reduce prostitution, Goodman renewed his call for a discussion about options for legalizing or decriminalizing prostitution.

“If I were to engage in discussion, I’d be thinking in terms of a Little Amsterdam,” a red-light district with legalized brothels, he said. “But I’m not advocating it.”

Prostitution is legal in 10 rural Nevada counties, but not in Clark or Washoe counties.

Goodman said legalized and regulated brothels over time could generate hundreds of millions of dollars for this area.

State Sen. Bob Coffin, D-Las Vegas, chairman of the Senate Taxation Committee, said last month he was open to the idea of holding a legislative hearing to discuss legalizing and taxing prostitution in the state’s urban counties.

It appears, however, that the Legislature will not act on that idea this session.

At a recent meeting of the Review-Journal editorial board, Sheriff Doug Gillespie spoke out strongly against such proposals.

For now, Goodman said, Las Vegas police should enforce the laws on the book.

Barbara Brents, a sociology professor at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, said she is surprised that law enforcement would focus so heavily on cracking down on prostitution.

“It seems pretty hypocritical to me to have an economy based on sexualizing women and then to come down on the women when police want to make it seem like they’re enforcing the law,” she said. “It’s coming down on women who are least able to fight back.”

Defense attorney James “Bucky” Buchanan, who has defended many clients accused of prostitution, sees practical problems with the effort.

“As much as Metro wants to do this, it’s just going to clog the courts,” he said. “I don’t think Metro has thought out the consequences and financial impact of this.”

On the bright side, Buchanan said, the crop of VETO arrests will make a lot of money for attorneys like him.

Contact reporter Alan Maimon at amaimon @reviewjournal.com or 702-383-0404.

Find this article at:
http://www.lvrj.com/news/39633407.html

Advertisements

4 Comments

  1. What I find crazy is that, as stated in the article, they aren’t going after the pimps, who do the most harm. Also, it’s okay for a man to approach a woman “aggrssively,” but a woman can’t approach a man on the same terms? C’mon. These woman hating hypochristians need to find something else better to do!

  2. In a time when the economy is doing so bad would it be such a bad idea to open a few brothels and generate millions of dollars for our community? Lets face it Las Vegas is famous for Gambling, Drugs, and Girls! Why do they promote Vegas as Sin City then turn around and make it a family city? Where do children fit in to gambling and drinking? Strip clubs, bars and all the promotion for beautiful women? The cocktail waitresses walk around half naked! Las Vegas is Sin City!!! Stop trying to make it something it is not. There is a strip club on almost every corner! If a man doesn’t want to pay for it he wont, but there are many men who come to Vegas just for the girls!! What about all the murders that they keep off the news? Or the violent crimes? Isn’t there more pressing issues that we could use tax payer money on? Building a court just for prostitutes?? Are you serious?? What about a housing development for all the homeless people on main street?? Why do you think our economy is doing so bad? Because we are focused on all the wrong things. Instead of trying to bring in a large amount of money they would rather spend money to keep prostitutes in court. Don’t they realize they would make more money if they took a percentage of the millions that flow through prostitutes hands??

  3. why would prostitution be legal in the brothels of “Rural Nevada” but not in Clark Country where all the action is? I think its pretty Obvious: MONEY.
    Prostitues have money. They get arrested, it is a misdemeanor charge that a hefty fine can usually take care of the ( I think its $600,) and then they are back on the street doing it all over again.
    Why would Clark county legalise something so lucrative?

    I thought jail was suposed to detour people from commiting crimes, and rehabilitate criminals. Apparantlly it becomes a business when the offenders have a seemingly endless supply of cash and will gladly pay $600 to wash their hands of the charge.

    in sin city, where the mighty dollar replaces the word of God, I am not surprised at this ass backward method of “cleaning up the streets.” But I do wonder where all the money is going to. it is clearly not being invested in beautifying the city, or in social programs, or the public school system…does anybody know?

    I am curious to see how much money is generated from prostitution arrests per year in Clark county Vs how much taxable income the legal brothels generate. I wonder if they make those numbers available.

    I wonder how much money is said to be spent on these “sting operations” (and if its accunted for) or if grand gestures like shutting down the Rio pool, and writing articles like this, are just a formailty to put an end to these questions- nip it in the bud, before the people of Las Vegas began to ask them.

    The economic recession of the past few years hit Nevada hard. Home forclosures, and job layoffs where a reality that for many in Clark County and the nearby areas had to endure. The gaming industry, Nevada’s bread and butter, was supposedly suffering; it was only a matter of time before the people would turn to other lucrative industries, like the sex trade and the many legal fines these women pay to the STATE and wonder what this money is being spent on.

    Creating media hype about cleaning up prostitution in Clark County implies that there is alot of money being spent toward this. it also insinuates that it is for the good of the citizens. Imagine living in a Las Vegas free of crime and prostiution! how wonderful… almost as great as decent welfare and unemployment insuarance for all the people that were suffering over the past few years. To me this is just propaganda: These highly publicised, high budget, (futile) sting operations are just a formality!

    The article mentions alot of the girls had been arrested for stealing from the hotel rooms, not street prostitution.
    Is theft, when done by a prostitute, taken as lightly as a prostituion charge in a state where prostitution is monstly legal? Isn’t one of the said goals of these sting operations to protect the innocent toursits? Perhaps some of these women wouldn’t resort to stealing if they weren’t constantly being thrown out of establishments and losing business. maybe if they were sufficiently punished for stealing from a customer it wouldn’t go on as frequently. To me this seems like a vicous cycle. Plastering photographs the “top offenders” (for prostitution and red light theft) in the news paper does more harm than good.

    I want to believe these cops are trying to look out for the good of the city, the citizens and the well being of the tourists. It just seems like a money grab with little regard for any of the said main objectives,

  4. the vegas veto team are the biggest most brutal GANG out here… they give police a very bad name they rape, rob, harass girls and intrude in our lives… if vegas was smart you would play along and get money… but lets not forget in Hooters hotel and Venetian they are selling those blackjack dealers and cocktail waitresses to the highrollers… theres a secret that you find about from someone who has a code of conduct and if he was ever caught he would be DONE…. all these people are stupid and gullable… i was born and raised out here and know that the police are disgusting to the point where they give fake names… they desrerve to go to jail for sure….


Comments RSS TrackBack Identifier URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s